Evidence Review

1. 1

   Present a summary of existing policies, laws, and regulations relevant to the identified problems.

2. 2

   Share key findings from research, studies, or consultations conducted prior to the workshop.

3. 3

   Highlight gaps in the existing regulatory framework that the new policy should address.

4. 4

   Encourage participants to share additional evidence from their own experience or expertise.

5. 5

   Critically evaluate the quality and relevance of the evidence presented.

6. 6

   Identify areas where evidence is lacking and note the need for further research.

7. 7

   Summarize the key evidence that will inform the policy options in the next phase.

• Q1.

  What existing policies or laws are relevant to this issue? Are they effective?

• Q2.

  What does the research or data tell us about the nature and extent of this problem?

• Q3.

  What have stakeholder consultations revealed about the needs and concerns of affected parties?

• Q4.

  Are there international best practices or comparable regulatory frameworks we should consider?

• Q5.

  What evidence gaps exist, and how should they inform our policy approach?

Record key responses, insights, and discussion points from participants.

AI will synthesize the participant responses into a structured summary. You can also write your own.

Document the final output of this phase: Evidence Summary.